Federalism
Categories: Home -> Political Science
This article is part of the Basic Course on Libertarianism and the Austrian School of Economics-> Module 3: Political Institutions
Last updated: 2026-05-08
Definition
Federalism is a system of political organization in which sovereign power is divided between a central (federal) government and multiple regional or state governments (provinces, cantons, Länder, etc.), each with autonomous competences and its own legitimacy, without one being hierarchically subordinated to the other in all areas.
Precise and conceptual definition
In philosophical-political terms, federalism is a form of institutional polycentrism that seeks to reconcile unity and diversity. It is not mere administrative decentralization (which can be revoked by the center), but a constitutional division of sovereignty: the federal government has limited and enumerated competences (defense, currency, interstate commerce, foreign relations), while the federated entities retain everything not explicitly delegated (principle of subsidiarity and residuality).
Importance
-
Exit vs. Voice: In Competition and Federalism (inspired by Tiebout and developed by Austrians), citizens can “vote with their feet” by migrating to jurisdictions with lower taxes, less regulation, or better protection of rights. This disciplines governments, unlike the unitary state monopoly.
-
Critique of centralism: Mises in Libertarianism and The Theory of Money and Credit warned that centralism facilitates interventionism, inflation, and socialism. A federal order limits the power of the Leviathan, reduces the size of the State, and preserves rational economic calculation by maintaining multiple legal frameworks.
Federalism according to Madison
For Madison, federalism was not mere administrative decentralization, but a real division of sovereignty: the federal government deals with general interests (defense, interstate commerce, currency, foreign relations), while the states retain everything else. This creates “double security” against tyranny.
Madison rejected the ancient idea (of Montesquieu and the Anti-Federalists) that a republic could only function in small and homogeneous territories. On the contrary:
- In a large and compound republic (the Union), factions multiply and neutralize one another.
-
A dangerous faction (for example, supporters of monetary inflation or redistribution of property) may dominate a state/province, but it will be much harder for it to capture the whole Country.
-
The influence of factious leaders may kindle a flame within a particular State/Province, but will be unable to spread a general conflagration through the other States/Provinces.
| Previous topic | Next topic | |
|---|---|---|
| <- The Republic | <--> | Democracy-> |
Categories: Home -> Political Science
Last updated: 2026-05-08
| | | |
This site was written based on publicly available free articles from the internet.
The content of this site is available under the: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license.
You can freely copy, redistribute and modify the material, as long as the source is mentioned: liberwiki.com