Basic concepts of formal logic
Categories: Home -> Philosophy -> Logic
What do you need to know about formal logic?
Statement, Proposition, Judgment
- Statement: any sentence in natural or formal language that can be true or false.
Example: “It is raining now”. - Proposition: It is the minimum unit of logical reasoning, an affirmation that has a truth value (T or F). It is what remains the same even if the language or the way of expressing it changes.
Example: “It is raining”, “Está lloviendo”, and “Il pleut”. They are three different statements, but they express the same proposition.
In formal logic we normally work with propositions (represented by letters p, q, r…).
- Judgment: Mental act by which something is affirmed or denied; it is the psychological operation that gives rise to the proposition.
Premise and Argument
A premise is a proposition or statement that serves as a basis for establishing, justifying, or inferring a conclusion within an argument.
An argument is a structured set of propositions where one or more propositions, called premises, are offered as reasons to support another proposition, called the conclusion. The premises try to give reasons for accepting the conclusion.
| Basic structure | Example |
|---|---|
| Premise 1 | 1. All mammals have a heart. |
| Premise 2 | 2. Dogs are mammals. |
| ... | |
| Conclusion | 3. → Dogs have a heart. |
Inference
Inference is the mental process or the logical act of deriving a conclusion from one or more premises. It is the step from the premises to the conclusion within an argument.
Types of Reasoning
These are the main types of inference or logical reasoning:
| Type of Reasoning | Direction of the Inference | Key Property | Example |
|---|---|---|---|
| Deduction | From the general to the particular | -> If the premises are true, the conclusion is necessarily true (Valid arguments). Level of Certainty: Offers logical certainty. |
All men are mortal. Socrates is a man. Therefore, Socrates is mortal. |
| Induction | From the particular to the general | -> The premises only make the conclusion probable, but do not guarantee it (Strong arguments). Level of Certainty: Offers probable conclusions, not necessary ones. -> It is the type of reasoning used in science. |
All the swans I have seen are white. Therefore, all swans are white. (until a black one was discovered) |
| Abduction | From effects to possible causes | Level of Certainty: Hypothetical (Best Explanation) | A hypothesis or the most probable explanation for a set of observations is formulated. It is the reasoning used for discovery. |
| Analogical | From the particular to the particular | Level of Certainty: Suggestive | One concludes that a case is similar to another in certain respects because they are similar in other known respects. The strength depends on the relevance of the similarity. |
Truth and Validity
Truth
It is a property of propositions; a proposition is true if it corresponds with reality.
Validity
An argument is valid when if the premises were true, then the conclusion would necessarily also be true. It does not matter whether the premises are in fact true or false: what matters is the logical form.
Validity depends solely on the structure of the argument, not on its content.
- If the argument has a form such that it is impossible for all the premises to be true and the conclusion false at the same time, then it is valid.
- If there exists at least one case where the premises can be true and the conclusion false, then it is invalid.
Examples of valid arguments
Examples: Valid syllogism
| Example | Structure |
|---|---|
| Premise 1: All dogs are mammals. | All A are B. |
| Premise 2: Rocky is a dog. | C is A. |
| Conclusion: Rocky is a mammal. | Therefore, C is B. |
In this case, there is NO way for the premises to be true and the conclusion false → valid.
Examples: Modus Ponens
| Example | Structure |
|---|---|
| Premise 1: If I study, I pass. | If P then Q. |
| Premise 2: I study. | P. |
| Conclusion: I pass. | Therefore Q. |
Absolutely valid form.
Examples of invalid arguments
Fallacy of affirming the consequent
| Example | Structure |
|---|---|
| Premise 1: If I study, I pass. | If P then Q. |
| Premise 2: I passed. | Q. |
| Conclusion: I studied. | Therefore P. |
Here there exists a case where P is false and Q is true (one passed by cheating). That is enough to make it invalid.
Badly structured syllogism
| Example | Structure |
|---|---|
| Premise 1: All cats are animals. | All A are B. |
| Premise 2: All dogs are animals. | All C are B. |
| Conclusion: All dogs are cats. | All C are A. |
The premises can be true and the conclusion false → invalid.
How to detect validity
Always ask yourself:
Is there any possible situation where the premises are true and the conclusion false?
- If none exists → the argument is valid.
- If even a single one exists → the argument is invalid.
This criterion is the heart of formal logic.
- Validity = impeccable structure.
- Truth = correct content.
- An argument can be:
- valid and with false premises,
- invalid and with true premises.
Only valid arguments can guarantee true conclusions when the premises are also true.
Form vs. Content
- Form (Logical Structure):
- It refers to the structure or mold of the argument, the way in which the terms and propositions are related.
- The validity of an argument depends solely on its form, not on the meaning of the specific words.
- Example of form: If P, then Q. P. Therefore, Q. (This is a valid form called Modus Ponens).
- Content (Logical Matter):
- It refers to the meaning or the real facts that the propositions deal with (the values of P and Q).
- Content is what determines whether a proposition is true or false.
In summary: Formal logic is concerned with the validity of the form, while truth is concerned with the content of the propositions.
To comment on or discuss this article
Click the link to access the discussions on the different networks
Next related page
Categories: Home -> Philosophy
Last updated: 2025-12-10
This site was written based on publicly available free articles from the internet.
The content of this site is available under the: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license.
You can freely copy, redistribute and modify the material, as long as the source is mentioned: liberwiki.com